{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-108209",
    "time_of_filling": "2025-12-18 09:40:29",
    "domain_names": [
        "ISYBANK.APP"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Olga Dvořáková (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A."
    ],
    "complainant_representative": null,
    "respondent": [
        "Regery Ukraine"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "<p><span>The Complainant is a leading Italian banking group. It is the company resulting from the merger (effective as of January 1, 2007) between Banca Intesa S.p.A. and Sanpaolo IMI S.p.A., two Italian banking groups. The Complainant has a market capitalization exceeding 101,38 billion Euro, provides its services to approximately 13,9 million customers, and is the leader in Italy with a network of approximately 2,800 branches and a market share of more than 13% in most Italian regions. Isybank S.p.A. is the Complainant's digital bank, dedicated to simplifying the management of<br \/>its customers&rsquo; accounts and banking operations. The main website of Isybank S.p.A. is available at&nbsp;<\/span>https:\/\/www.isybank.com\/it\/,<br \/><br \/><span>The disputed domain name was registered on June 6, 2025, and is being used in connection with a phishing website.<\/span><\/p>",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "<p>The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>",
    "no_response_filed": "<p><span>COMPLAINANT:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is identical to the Trademark, as it <\/span><span>reproduces the well-known Trademark exactly.<\/span><span><\/span><br \/><br \/><span>Furthermore, the Complainant contends that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name. In this regard, the Complainant states that the disputed domain name does not correspond to the Respondent's name, that the Respondent is not commonly known as 'ISYBANK', and that the Respondent's use of the disputed domain name is neither non-commercial nor fair.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Finally, the Complainant contends that the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. In this regard, the Complainant contends that the Trademark is distinctive and well known around the world, that it is more than likely that the disputed domain name would not have been registered if it were not for the Trademark, and that the Respondent had knowledge of the Trademark at the time of registering the disputed domain name.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;As to bad faith use, the Complainant states that the Respondent's use of the disputed domain name in connection with a phishing website is not bona fide under the Policy but rather indicates that the Respondent has intentionally attempted to attract, for commercial gain, Internet users to his web site, by creating a likelihood of confusion with the Trademark.<\/p>\n<p><br \/><span>RESPONDENT:<\/span><br \/><br \/><span>No administratively compliant Response has been filed.<\/span><\/p>",
    "rights": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "bad_faith": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "procedural_factors": "<p>The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Peter Müller (Presiding Panelist)"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2026-01-28 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "<p><span>The Complainant owns several trademarks for the word 'ISY' as well as <\/span><span>trademarks for 'ISY' in combination with other words, such as 'BANK', 'PRIME', 'SMART', 'LIGHT' and 'TECH'. These include <\/span><span>EU trademark registration no. 018640470 'ISYBANK'<\/span><span>, which was registered on January 1, 2025, for various services in class 36 (hereinafter referred to as the \"Trademark\").<\/span><\/p>",
    "decision_domains": {
        "ISYBANK.APP": "TRANSFERRED"
    }
}