{ "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-108351", "time_of_filling": "2026-01-30 07:52:10", "domain_names": [ "siemens318.com", "siemens298.com", "siemens299.com", "siemens300.com", "siemens301.com", "siemens302.com", "siemens303.com ", "siemens304.com", "siemens305.com", "siemens306.com", "siemens307.com", "siemens308.com", "siemens309.com", "siemens310.com", "siemens311.com", "siemens312.com", "siemens313.com", "siemens314.com", "siemens316.com", "siemens317.com", "siemens2.com" ], "case_administrator": " Iveta Špiclová (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)", "complainant": [ "Siemens Trademark GmbH & Co. KG " ], "complainant_representative": "Coöperatie SNB-REACT U.A.", "respondent": [ "俊 张· 俊 张·", "zho u ba pi zho u ba pi (a shi da shi da shi d a shi da shi)" ], "respondent_representative": null, "factual_background": "

The Complainant is a trademark holding company, licensing the trade marks within Siemens Group.<\/p>\n

Siemens is a technology group founded more than 175 years ago and is active across 190 countries. It focuses on the areas of automation and digitalisation in the process and manufacturing industries, intelligent infrastructure for buildings and distributed energy systems, smart mobility solutions for rail transport, and medical technology and digital healthcare services.<\/p>\n

As of September 30, 2024, Siemens had around 327,000 employees. In 2024, Siemens Group’s revenue was 75.9 billion Euros and its net income was 9 billion Euros.<\/p>\n

The Respondent registered the disputed domain names on June 17, 2025, save for <siemens2.com> which was registered on June 16, 2025. At the time of filing the Complaint, the disputed domain names resolved to inactive webpages.<\/p>", "other_legal_proceedings": "

The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain names.<\/p>", "no_response_filed": "

The Complainant contends that the requirements of the Policy have been met and that the disputed domain names should be transferred to it.
No administratively compliant Response has been filed.<\/p>", "rights": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>", "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain names (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "bad_faith": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names have been registered and are being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "procedural_factors": "

Language of the Proceeding<\/strong><\/p>\n

The language of the Registration Agreement for only one of the disputed domain names, namely <siemens2.com>, is Chinese. The language of the Registration Agreement for the remaining disputed domain names is English.<\/p>\n

Pursuant to the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules“)<\/span>, paragraph 11(a), in the absence of an agreement between the parties, or unless specified otherwise in the registration agreement, the language of the administrative proceeding shall be the language of the registration agreement.<\/p>\n

The Complaint was filed in English. The Complainant requested that the language of the proceedings in relation to the domain name <siemens2.com> be English since the Registration Agreement for the remaining 20 disputed domain names is in English. Further, the disputed domain names are all formed by words in the Latin script and not in Chinese characters, and they are in the international “.com zone”. Requiring the Complainant to translate the Complaint into Chinese would impose an undue burden on the Complainant and delay the proceeding.<\/p>\n

The Respondent did not make any submissions with respect to the language of the proceeding. <\/p>\n

In exercising its discretion to use a language other than that of the registration agreement, the Panel has to exercise such discretion judicially in the spirit of fairness and justice to both parties, taking into account all relevant circumstances of the case, including matters such as the parties’ ability to understand and use the proposed language, time and costs (see WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions, Third Edition (“WIPO Overview 3.0”), section 4.5.1).<\/p>\n

Having considered the circumstances of this case including the composition of the disputed domain names which contains the name “Siemens” which is in Latin characters, and the generic Top-Level Domain “com” which applies to all of the disputed domain names, the Panel determines under paragraph 11(a) of the Rules that the language of the proceeding for the domain name <siemens2.com> shall be English. There does not appear to be any reason which warrants a delay and additional expense in ordering the Complainant to translate the Complaint in relation to the domain name <siemens2.com>.<\/p>\n

Other procedural matters<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>", "decision": "Accepted", "panelists": [ "Francine Tan" ], "date_of_panel_decision": "2026-02-25 00:00:00", "informal_english_translation": "

The Complainant’s trademark rights in SIEMENS date back to at least 1986.<\/p>\n

The Complainant’s trademark registrations include:<\/p>\n