{ "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-108327", "time_of_filling": "2026-01-16 10:07:03", "domain_names": [ "amanbrickell.miami" ], "case_administrator": " Iveta Špiclová (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)", "complainant": [ "Aman Group S.á.r.I. " ], "complainant_representative": "HSS IPM GmbH", "respondent": [ "Gaston Lauge" ], "respondent_representative": null, "factual_background": "

Aman Group S.á.r.I., along with its affiliates, subsidiaries and related entities, is a luxury hotel and accommodation business with around 35 destinations in 20 countries, 15 of which are located close to or within Unesco-protected sites. True to the brand’s pioneering spirit, a further ten projects have been announced to date as part of a robust future pipeline. Complainant’s Aman destinations are renowned for space and privacy, welcoming guests as if to the home of a close friend, instilling a sense of peace and belonging amid some of the most diverse natural and historical landscapes. It is an approach that has changed little since 1988 when the first retreat was built on Phuket’s west coast. It was named Amanpuri, meaning ‘place of peace’, and Aman was born.<\/p>\n

Due to extensive use, advertising, and revenue associated with its trademarks worldwide, AMAN has achieved a high level of international recognition and distinctiveness, as recognized by Travel Luxury Intelligence in 2018 when AMAN was rated number one in the Top Luxury Hotel Brands.<\/p>", "other_legal_proceedings": "

The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>", "no_response_filed": "

The Complainant contends that the requirements of the Policy have been met and that the disputed domain name should be transferred to it. The Complainant makes a number of legal arguments and also supplies a set of annexes providing evidence of its activities and of the Respondent's use of a mere webpage pretending a forthcoming large luxury complex.<\/span><\/p>\n

No administratively compliant Response has been filed by the Respondent.<\/span><\/p>", "rights": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>", "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "bad_faith": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "procedural_factors": "

It ought to be indicated that the <\/span>CAC<\/span> <\/span>was unable to send the written notice to the Respondent as the address provided by the Registrar in \"Registrar verification\" information does not exist. The <\/span>CAC<\/span> nevertheless sent the <\/span>notice<\/span> and the postal service provider <\/span>was not able to<\/span> deliver a written notice to such address.<\/span><\/p>\n

No other address for correspondence was found on the disputed domain name.<\/span><\/p>\n

The notice of the Commencement of the administrative proceeding was sent also by e-mail. Yet, the e-mail notices sent to postmaster@amanbrickell.miami<\/a>, has permanent fatal errors and to gastonmiami@gmail.com<\/a> no proof of receipt or undelivery has been received. No further e-mail addresses could be found on the disputed site.<\/p>", "decision": "Accepted", "panelists": [ "David-Irving Tayer" ], "date_of_panel_decision": "2026-03-02 00:00:00", "informal_english_translation": "

The Complainant is the owner of numerous trademarks filed or registered worldwide, including but not limited to the following:<\/span><\/p>\n