{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-108408",
    "time_of_filling": "2026-02-16 09:25:25",
    "domain_names": [
        "amundi-finances.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "AMUNDI ASSET MANAGEMENT"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "NAMESHIELD S.A.S.",
    "respondent": [
        "Nerc Be (Containers SL)"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "<p>Complainant states that it is &ldquo;Europe&rsquo;s number one asset manager by assets under management and has offices in Europe, Asia-Pacific, the Middle-East and the Americas&rdquo;; and that &ldquo;[w]ith over 100 million retail, institutional and corporate clients, the Complainant ranks in the top 10 globally.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>The Disputed Domain Name was created on October 30, 2025, and, according to the Complaint, &ldquo;redirects to a website offering competing financial services.&rdquo; &nbsp;In support thereof, Complainant has provided a screenshot from a website associated with the Disputed Domain Name, which appears to offer financial services.<\/p>",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "<p>The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings that are pending or decided and that relate to the Disputed Domain Name.<\/p>",
    "no_response_filed": "<p>Complainant contends, in relevant part, as follows:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Paragraph 4(a)(i): Complainant states that the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the AMUNDI Trademark because the Disputed Domain Name &ldquo;contains the Complainant&rsquo;s trademark AMUNDI in its entirety&rdquo; and the addition of the word &ldquo;finances&rdquo; &ldquo;does not change the overall impression of the designation as being connected to the Complainant&rsquo;s trademark AMUNDI.&rdquo;<\/li>\n<li>Paragraph 4(a)(ii): Complainant states that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Disputed Domain Name because, inter alia, &ldquo;Respondent is not known as the disputed domain name&rdquo;; Respondent &ldquo;is not related in any way to the Complainant&rsquo;s business&rdquo;; &ldquo;the disputed domain name redirects to a website offering financial services, which compete with the Complainant&rsquo;s services&rdquo; and &ldquo;uses the Complainant&rsquo;s address&rdquo;; and &ldquo;[u]sing a confusingly similar domain name that resolves to a competing webpage is not a bona fide offering of goods or services.&rdquo;<\/li>\n<li>Paragraph 4(a)(iii): Complainant states that the Disputed Domain Name was registered and is being used in bad faith because, inter alia, &ldquo;the disputed domain name redirects to a website offering competing financial services&rdquo;; &ldquo;given the distinctiveness of the Complainant's trademark and reputation, it is reasonable to infer that the Respondent has registered the domain name with full knowledge of the Complainant's trademarks&rdquo;; the website associated with the Disputed Domain Name &ldquo;uses the Complainant&rsquo;s address&rdquo;; by &ldquo;us[ing the domain name to divert Internet users searching for the Complainant&rsquo;s website to the Respondent&rsquo;s competing website,&rdquo; Respondent has &ldquo;create[d] a likelihood of confusion with the Complainant&rsquo;s mark for the Respondent&rsquo;s commercial gain by offering competing services.&rdquo;<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>No administratively compliant response has been filed.<\/p>",
    "rights": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Disputed Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the UDRP).<\/p>",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Disputed Domain Name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the UDRP).<\/p>",
    "bad_faith": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Disputed Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the UDRP).<\/p>",
    "procedural_factors": "<p>The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Douglas Isenberg"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2026-03-27 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "<p>Complainant states, and provides documentation in support thereof, that it is the owner of Int&rsquo;l Reg. No. 1024160 for AMUNDI (registered September 24, 2009) for use in connection with, <em>inter alia<\/em>, &ldquo;financial affairs, banking operations, monetary affairs.&rdquo; &nbsp;This registration is referred to herein as the &ldquo;AMUNDI Trademark.&rdquo;<\/p>",
    "decision_domains": {
        "amundi-finances.com": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}