{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-108400",
    "time_of_filling": "2026-02-16 11:15:39",
    "domain_names": [
        "rocketplayx.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Olga Dvořáková (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "Valentina AVGOUSTI (PULSUP LTD)"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": null,
    "respondent": [
        "Columbus  Walter"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "<p><strong>A<\/strong>.<strong> Complainant<\/strong>'<strong>s Assertions<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Complainant is a company incorporated in Cyprus and operates an online gambling platform under the name ROCKETPLAY, available at &lt;rocketplay.com&gt; since 2020.<\/p>\n<p>The platform provides real-money online casino services and has obtained a degree of recognition within the iGaming sector. The case record includes evidence of industry awards, nominations, and favourable consumer reviews on independent platforms.<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant retains ownership of the ROCKETPLAY trade mark and associated intellectual property, including branding elements and website design.<\/p>\n<p><strong>B<\/strong>. <strong>Respondent<\/strong>'<strong>s Position<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Respondent has not participated in the proceedings and has not asserted any rights in the disputed domain name.<\/p>\n<p><strong>C<\/strong>.<strong> Disputed Domain Name<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The disputed domain name &lt;rocketplayx.com&gt; was registered on 6 March 2025.<\/p>\n<p>The evidence indicates that the disputed domain name has been associated with content reproducing elements of the Complainant&rsquo;s branding and website presentation. The case record further shows that access to the corresponding website has been restricted at times, while the domain name remains active and accessible through search engine indexing.<\/p>",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "<p>The Panel is unaware of any other pending or decided legal proceedings in respect of the domain name &lt;rocketplayx.com&gt; (the \"disputed domain name\").<\/p>",
    "no_response_filed": "<p><strong>A<\/strong>.<strong> Complainant<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>A<\/strong>.<strong>1 The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark in which the Complainant has rights<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name incorporates its ROCKETPLAY trade mark in its entirety, with the addition of the letter \"x\". It submits that the mark remains clearly recognisable within the disputed domain name and that the addition of a single letter does not prevent a finding of confusing similarity. The Complainant characterises this addition as a minor typographical variation.<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant further contends that the generic Top-Level Domain (the \"TLD\") &lt;.com&gt; should be disregarded for the purposes of comparison.<\/p>\n<p><strong>A<\/strong>.<strong>2 The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Complainant contends that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name. It states that the Respondent has not been authorised to use the ROCKETPLAY trade mark and that there is no relationship between the Parties. The Complainant further submits that there is no evidence that the Respondent is commonly known by the disputed domain name or holds any corresponding trade mark rights.<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant also relies on evidence that the disputed domain name has been used in connection with content reproducing elements of the Complainant's branding, including references to its services and visual features of its website. It submits that such use is inconsistent with any legitimate commercial or non-commercial activity.&nbsp; <strong data-start=\"3872\" data-end=\"3975\"><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>A<\/strong>.<strong>3 The disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name was registered with knowledge of its ROCKETPLAY trade mark, which it states had already acquired goodwill and recognition at the time of registration.<\/p>\n<p>It further contends that the disputed domain name constitutes a typographical variation of its mark and is indicative of targeting.<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant relies on evidence that the disputed domain name has been used in a manner reproducing elements of its branding and website presentation, including visual features, and that such use creates a likelihood of confusion as to source or affiliation.<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant also refers to evidence that the disputed domain name has appeared in search engine results displaying its branding and that users have accessed the domain name directly. It submits that these factors support a finding that the Respondent has sought to attract Internet users through confusion with the Complainant's mark.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>A<\/strong>.<strong>4 Relief Sought <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Complainant requests that the disputed domain name &lt;rocketplayx.com&gt; be transferred to the Complainant in accordance with paragraph 4(i) of the UDRP Policy.<\/p>\n<p><strong>B<\/strong>. <strong>Respondent<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>No Response was filed. The Panel therefore proceeds on the basis of the uncontested evidence and may draw such inferences as it considers appropriate pursuant to Rule 14(b) of the UDRP Rules.<\/p>",
    "rights": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the UDRP Policy).<\/p>",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the UDRP Policy).<\/p>",
    "bad_faith": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown that the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the UDRP Policy).<\/p>",
    "procedural_factors": "<p>The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under the UDRP Policy, the UDRP Rules, and the CAC Supplemental Rules have been met. The dispute is properly before the Panel.<\/p>",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Yana Zhou"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2026-04-01 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "<p>The Complainant, PULSUP LTD, is the holder of several trade marks for the word mark ROCKETPLAY, including, <em>inter alia<\/em>:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">&bull; Australian trade mark registration no. 2499913, registered on 18 November 2024; and<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">&bull; EU trade mark registration no. 018992626, registered on 7 November 2025.<\/p>\n<p>(Each a \"trade mark\" and collectively, the \"Complainant's trade marks\").<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant also relies on unregistered rights arising from continuous use of the ROCKETPLAY mark since 2020.<\/p>",
    "decision_domains": {
        "rocketplayx.com": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}