The Complainant is a major French online banking and financial services provider. It has used the BOURSORAMA name for many years and operates its principal online presence through the domain name <boursorama.com>.<\/p>\n
The disputed domain name reproduces the Complainant’s mark in its entirety and adds the French word “securite” for “security”. The context is online banking.<\/p>\n
The Respondent is a Julien Leroux, of Paris, France. Nothing else is known about him. The disputed domain name <boursorama-securite.com> was registered on 4 March 2026. According to the complaint, the disputed domain name resolved to a parking page displaying commercial pay-per-click links as of 9 March 2026.<\/p>", "other_legal_proceedings": "
The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>", "no_response_filed": "
The Complainant contends, in summary, that: (1) the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the BOURSORAMA mark because it incorporates that mark in its entirety, with the addition only of the descriptive word “securite” and the “.com” suffix; (2) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name, is not commonly known by it, and has never been authorised to use the BOURSORAMA mark; and (3) the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith because it targets a well-known banking mark and resolves to a monetised parking page with pay per click links likely to attract Internet users by confusion.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
No administratively compliant Response has been filed.<\/p>",
"rights": "
The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>", "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "
The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "bad_faith": "
The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "procedural_factors": "
The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>", "decision": "Accepted", "panelists": [ "Victoria McEvedy" ], "date_of_panel_decision": "2026-04-13 00:00:00", "informal_english_translation": "
The Complainant relies on registered rights in the mark BOURSORAMA in particular, the Complainant’s EUTM (European Union Trade Mark) Reg. No. 001758614 for the word mark BOURSORAMA, registered on 19 October 2001 in class 36 and other classes.<\/p>\n
The Complainant says its BOURSORAMA mark is a well-known mark in the field of financial services and banking, and it has millions of customers and a substantial online presence. Previous UDRP panels have recognised the reputation of the BOURSORAMA mark arising from its longstanding use of the word mark BOURSORAMA in trade in connection with online banking, online brokerage and financial information services.<\/p>\n
It makes online use at the related domain names including <boursorama.com>, registered on 1 March 1998, and <boursoramabanque.com>, registered on 26 May 2005.<\/p>", "decision_domains": { "boursorama-securite.com": "TRANSFERRED" }, "panelist": null, "panellists_text": null }