{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-108488",
    "time_of_filling": "2026-03-12 13:24:20",
    "domain_names": [
        "1-xbetindia.net ",
        "1-xbetindia.com "
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "MOKVEZA LTD"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Karel Sindelka (Sindelka & Lachmannová advokáti s.r.o.)",
    "respondent": [
        "Dilafruz Erdonova"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "<p>The Complainant, MOKVEZA LTD, forms part of a group of companies operating under the trademark name &ldquo;1XBET&rdquo; an online gaming platform. The 1XBET platform offers a range of services such as sports betting, lotteries, bingo, and live betting. The 1XBET platform was founded in 2007 and holds a license issued by the government of Cura&ccedil;ao. It is also a sponsor of soccer competitions.<\/p>\n<p>The Respondent registered the disputed domain names &lt;1-xbetindia.net&gt; and &lt;1-xbetindia.com&gt; on July 9, 2024.<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant submitted the following documents to prove the abovementioned facts:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>Annex-1-1: xBet-Bookmaker-Best-Betting-Sites-2024<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Annex-2a: photo-2024-04-04-12-49-19<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Annex-2b: 1xbet.com<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Annex-2c: 1xbet.com<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Annex-2d: 1xbet.com<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Annex-2 e: 1xbet.com<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Annex-3: FC-Barcelona-adds-1XBET-as-a-new-global-partner<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Annex-4: Liverpool-go-all-in-with-1xBet-SportsPro<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Annex-5: OG-Esports-and-1xBET-join-forces-in-new-partnership-OG<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Annex-6a: Whois-1-xbetindia.net<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Annex-6b: Whois-1-xbetindia.com<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>Annex-7a: EUTM-certificate-017517384-1XBET<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Annex-7b: EUTM-certificate-017517327-1XBET<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Annex-7c: EM500000014227681-1XBET-WORD<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Annex-8-1: 1xBet-Online-Casino-India-Games-Bonuses-Promotions<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Annex-8-1: 1xBet-Online-Casino-India-Games-Bonuses-Promotions-EN-translation<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Annex-9: 1xbet-Hledat-Googlem<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Annex-10: redirection-Google-Chrome-2026-03-12-12-57-46<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "<p>The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain names.<\/p>",
    "no_response_filed": "<p>The Complainant contends that the requirements of the Policy have been met and that the disputed domain name should be transferred to it. <br \/>No administratively compliant Response has been filed.<\/p>",
    "rights": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain names (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "bad_faith": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names have been registered and are being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "procedural_factors": "<p>1. Consolidation of the complaint for the disputed domain names<\/p>\n<p>As stated in section 4.11.2 of the WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Select UDRP Questions (&ldquo;WIPO Overview 3.1&rdquo;) when considering consolidation requests panels should look at whether (i) the domain names or corresponding websites are subject to common control, and (ii) the consolidation would be fair and equitable to all parties. Procedural efficiency underpins such consideration.<\/p>\n<p>The Panel notes that it is for the complainant to expressly request consolidation and to provide supporting arguments in this respect.<\/p>\n<p>In the present case, however, the record shows that the disputed domain names were both registered on July 9, 2024, and share the same registrant and registrar. These elements support a finding that the disputed domain names are subject to common control.<\/p>\n<p>In the absence of any indication that consolidation would be unfair or prejudicial to the Respondent, and in the interest of procedural efficiency, the Panel finds that consolidation of the Complaint is appropriate in this case.<\/p>\n<p>2. Procedural compliance<\/p>\n<p>The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Nathalie Dreyfus"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2026-04-16 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "<p>The Complainant has proved to own the following trademark rights, inter alia:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>European Union trademark 1XBET No. 014227681 registered on September 21, 2015 (renewed) and covering services in classes 35, 41 and 42;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>European Union figurative trademark 1XBET No. 017517327 registered on March 7, 2018 and covering services in classes 41 and 42;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>European Union figurative trademark 1XBET No. 017517384 registered on March 7, 2018 and covering services in classes 41 and 42.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>",
    "decision_domains": {
        "1-xbetindia.net ": "TRANSFERRED",
        "1-xbetindia.com ": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}