The Complainant, Siemens Trademark GmbH & Co. KG, is part of the Siemens Group, a global technology company headquartered in Germany. The Complainant manages the Siemens Group’s trademark portfolio.<\/p>\n
The Siemens Group is active internationally in technology, industry, infrastructure, mobility, and healthcare-related goods and services. The SIEMENS mark is widely recognized globally. The SIEMENS Healthineers mark is used in connection with the Siemens Group’s healthcare business, including medical technology, diagnostic equipment, and healthcare solutions. <\/p>\n
The SIEMENS Healtheneers is also used by Siemens Healtheneers, another company of the Siemens Group, and is one of the largest manufacturers of mediac equipment worldwide with approx. 73,000 employees and a presense in over 70 countries. <\/p>", "other_legal_proceedings": "
The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain names.<\/p>", "no_response_filed": "
No administratively compliant Response has been filed.<\/p>", "rights": "
The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>", "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "
The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain names (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "bad_faith": "
The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names have been registered and are being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "procedural_factors": "
Language of the Proceedings<\/p>\n
The language of the registration agreement is Chinese. Pursuant to paragraph 11(a) of the Rules, in the absence of an agreement between the parties, or unless specified otherwise in the registration agreement, the language of the administrative proceeding shall be the language of the registration agreement, subject to the Panel’s authority to determine otherwise.<\/p>\n
The Complaint was filed in English. The Complainant requests that English be the language of the proceeding. The disputed domain names consist of Latin characters and incorporate the Complainant’s SIEMENS Healthineers mark. The record also shows that the disputed domain names were used in connection with English-language websites impersonating the Complainant’s SIEMENS Healthineers business, which demonstrates that the Respondent understands English well. The use of Chinese in this case would also impose a burden on the Complainant which must be deemed significant in view of the low cost of these proceedings.<\/p>\n
The Respondent did not make any submissions with respect to the language of the proceeding.<\/p>\n
In exercising its discretion to use a language other than that of the registration agreement, the Panel has to exercise such discretion judicially in the spirit of fairness and justice to both parties, taking into account all relevant circumstances of the case, including matters such as the parties’ ability to understand and use the proposed language, time and costs (see WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions, Third Edition (“WIPO Overview 3.1”), section 4.5.1).<\/p>\n
Having considered the circumstances of this case including the composition of the disputed domain name which contains the words in Latin characters, as well as the silence of the Respondent in this proceeding, the Panel determines under paragraph 11(a) of the Rules that the language of the proceeding shall be English. There does not appear to be any reasons which warrant a delay and additional expense in ordering the Complainant to translate the Complaint.<\/p>\n
The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>", "decision": "Accepted", "panelists": [ "Jonathan Agmon" ], "date_of_panel_decision": "2026-05-02 00:00:00", "informal_english_translation": "
The Complainant is the owner of various trademark registrations for “SIEMENS” and “SIEMENS Healthineers” including the following:<\/p>\n
International Registration No. 637074 for SIEMENS, registered March 31, 1995.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
The Complainant also owns and operates domain names incorporating its SIEMENS and SIEMENS Healthineers marks, including <siemens.com> and <siemens-healthineers.com>.<\/p>\n
The disputed domain names were registered as follows:<\/p>\n
At the time of filing, the disputed domain names did not resolve to active websites and instead returned error messages indicating that the domains could not be reached.<\/p>\n
The record also includes evidence that the disputed domain names were previously used in connection with websites impersonating the Complainant’s SIEMENS Healthineers business, including by displaying the SIEMENS Healthineers mark, branding, and English-language content.<\/p>\n
The Respondent is MENGNA of Guang Xi Long Zhou Xian Xia Dong Zhen Dong Bu Cun Jin Bang Tun 42 Hao, Chong Zuo Shi, Guang Xi 532405, China.<\/p>", "decision_domains": { "siemens-healthineerss.fit": "TRANSFERRED", "siemens-healthineerss.cc": "TRANSFERRED", "siemens-healthineers-jp.club": "TRANSFERRED" }, "panelist": null, "panellists_text": null }