<\/p>\n
The Complainant is a Hong Kong company specializing in customizable and protective technology accessories, including phone cases and watch bands, marketed under the CASETIFY brand. Founded in 2011 by Wesley Ng, the Complainant has grown into an international business with offices in multiple jurisdictions and customers worldwide.<\/p>\n
The Complainant states that it has protected more than 20 million devices globally and has collaborated with hundreds of artists and designers. The Complainant maintains a substantial online presence through its official website and social media platforms including 2.7M followers on Instagram, 2.1M followers on Facebook and 777K followers on TikTok.<\/p>\n
According to SimilarWeb data submitted by the Complainant, the Complainant’s website received approximately 6.6 million visits in December 2025.<\/p>\n
Registration of the disputed domain name<\/strong><\/p>\n The disputed domain name <casetifi.com> was registered on May 6, 2020.<\/span><\/p>\n First UDRP Element - disputed domain name is Confusingly Similar to the Complainant’s Trademark<\/strong><\/p>\n The Complainant asserts that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its CASETIFY trademark because it differs by only one letter, namely the substitution of the letter “i” for the letter “y”.<\/p>\n The Complainant contends that this constitutes a classic example of typosquatting intended to capitalize on typographical errors made by Internet users attempting to reach the Complainant’s official website.<\/p>\n The Complainant further submits that the “.com” gTLD does not avoid confusing similarity.<\/p>\n Second UDRP Element – The Respondent has no Rights or Legitimate Interests in the disputed domain name<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n The Complainant asserts that the Respondent is not affiliated with, licensed by, or otherwise authorized to use the CASETIFY trademark.<\/p>\n The Complainant further asserts that the Respondent is not commonly known by the disputed domain name. The Whois information identifies the registrant as “Domain Administrator \/ Fundacion Privacy Services LTD”, which bears no resemblance to the disputed domain name.<\/p>\n The Complainant also contends that the disputed domain name resolves to a parking page displaying pay-per-click links, including links relating to products competing with those of the Complainant.<\/p>\n Further, the disputed domain name has active MX records configured, suggesting possible use for email communications that could facilitate phishing or impersonation activity.<\/p>\n The Complainant additionally submits that the disputed domain name is being offered for sale for valuable consideration far exceeding the Respondent’s out-of-pocket registration costs.<\/p>\n Third UDRP Element – The disputed domain name was Registered and is Being Used in Bad Faith<\/strong><\/p>\n The Complainant asserts that its CASETIFY trademark had become known internationally with trademark registrations across numerous countries long before registration of the disputed domain name in 2020.<\/p>\n The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is an intentional misspelling of the CASETIFY trademark and of the Complainant’s primary domain name <casetify.com>, demonstrating that the Respondent had the Complainant in mind when registering the disputed domain name.<\/p>\n The Complainant further submits that the disputed domain name has been used to host a pay-per-click parking page containing links related to the Complainant’s field of business, thereby attempting to attract Internet users for commercial gain through confusion with the Complainant’s trademark.<\/p>\n The Complainant also relies on the existence of MX records associated with the disputed domain name, enabling the disputed domain name to be used for email communications, as additional evidence of bad faith.<\/p>\n Finally, the Complainant notes that the disputed domain name has been offered for sale and that the Respondent employed privacy services to conceal its identity.<\/p>\n The foregoing facts and arguments asserted by the Complainant are uncontested because no Response was filed.<\/p>",
"other_legal_proceedings": " The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>",
"no_response_filed": " Complainant´s contentions are summarized above.<\/p>\n The Complainant contends that the requirements of the Policy have been met and that the disputed domain name should be transferred to it.<\/p>\n No administratively compliant Response has been filed.<\/p>",
"rights": " The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>",
"no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": " The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
"bad_faith": " The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
"procedural_factors": " The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
"decision": "Accepted",
"panelists": [
"Claire Kowarsky"
],
"date_of_panel_decision": "2026-05-11 00:00:00",
"informal_english_translation": " <\/p>\n The Complainant relies on several of its registered trademarks, in territories around the world, including:<\/p>\n Mark<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Territory<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Registration No.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Registration Date<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n\n CASETIFY<\/p>\n<\/td>\n United States<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 4707090<\/p>\n<\/td>\n March 24, 2015<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n CASETIFY<\/p>\n<\/td>\n United States<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 6908208<\/p>\n<\/td>\n November 22, 2022<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n CASETIFY<\/p>\n<\/td>\n United States<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 6908209<\/p>\n<\/td>\n November 22, 2022<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n CASETIFY<\/p>\n<\/td>\n WIPO International Registration<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 1409914<\/p>\n<\/td>\n April 4, 2018<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n CASETIFY<\/p>\n<\/td>\n China<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 19614307<\/p>\n<\/td>\n August 21, 2017<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n Further, the Complainant operates its business using its domain name <casetify.com>, which was registered on November 22, 2013.<\/p>",
"decision_domains": {
"casetifi.com": "TRANSFERRED"
},
"panelist": null,
"panellists_text": null
}\n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n