{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-108550",
    "time_of_filling": "2026-04-03 08:18:20",
    "domain_names": [
        "action-paysend.com ",
        "paysend-id644-receive.com",
        "paysend-id6255-au.com",
        "pay-send-aus.com ",
        "pay-send-id.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Olga Dvořáková (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "PaySend Group Limited "
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Igor Motsnyi (Motsnyi IP Group (dba Motsnyi Legal))",
    "respondent": [
        "jiowemk ekoweko eoweokw ekoweko eoweokw jiowemk",
        "Kiril Avganov Rachitov Avganov Rachitov Kiril"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "<p>The Complainant was the first FinTech project to introduce international card-to-card transfers, allowing connections between 12 billion cards globally. Since the Complainant&rsquo;s business started in 2017 it has launched a number of products, including &ldquo;Paysend Global Account&rdquo;, &ldquo;Paysend Connect&rdquo;, &ldquo;Paysend Business&rdquo; and &ldquo;Paysend Libre&rdquo;.<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant currently serves over ten million customers and operates in more than 170 countries. It is headquartered in the UK (with offices in Edinburgh and London) and its subsidiaries are located in various countries, including the US, Ireland and Serbia. It has a strong social media presence with more than fifty thousand followers and has been recognised as one of the top global money transfer services by various independent sources.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The disputed domain names were registered on the following dates:<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<span>&lt;pay-send-aus.com&gt; - January 10, 2026;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>&lt;pay-send-id.com&gt; - January 10, 2026;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>&lt;paysend-id6255-au.com&gt; - January 17, 2026;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>&lt;paysend-id644-receive.com&gt; - January 17, 2026;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>&lt;action-paysend.com&gt; - February 23, 2026.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>At the time of filing, the disputed domain names each resolve to a webpage that claims to conduct a \"verification procedure\" and once \"verification\" is complete, they resolve to error pages.<strong>&nbsp;<\/strong>The Complainant's purple \"P\" logo is displayed in the upper corner of each webpage during the \"verification\" process.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><\/p>",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "<p>The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain names.<\/p>",
    "no_response_filed": "<p>The Complainant contends that the requirements of the Policy have been met and that the disputed domain names should be transferred to it. No administratively compliant Response has been filed.<\/p>",
    "rights": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain names (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "bad_faith": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names have been registered and are being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "procedural_factors": "<p><span>According to the Registrar Verification, <\/span><span>the registrants of the disputed domain names are:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>jiowemk ekoweko eoweokw, ekoweko eoweokw jiowemk (domain names &lt;action-paysend.com&gt;, &lt;paysend-id644-receive.com&gt; and &lt;paysend-id6255-au.com&gt;); and<\/li>\n<li>Kiril Avganov Rachitov Avganov Rachitov Kiril (domain names &lt;pay-send-aus.com&gt; and &lt;pay-send-id.com&gt;).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The Complainant seeks the consolidation of the five complaints into one proceeding and submits that the disputed domain names are registered by the same person and\/or are subject to common control and that it would be equitable and procedurally efficient to permit the consolidation. In this regard, the Complainant submits that:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>All five disputed domain names are registered with the same Registrar - \"NameSilo\" and share the same Name Server records &nbsp;- \"Cloudflare\" ;<\/li>\n<li>All five disputed domain names were registered within a relatively short time frame, between January 10, 2026 and February 23, 2026;<\/li>\n<li>All the disputed domain names are used in a similar fashion in that they all resolve to pages containing an identical \"verification\" message in English and then they resolve to an error page;<\/li>\n<li>All the disputed domain names represent a very similar pattern of domain name registration - Complainant's mark, a hyphen and a descriptive, geographical, or meaningless term;<\/li>\n<li>The registrants' data is clearly false. In particular, says the Complainant, the Respondent provided false personal details and contact details, including obviously fake names (a number of random characters - \"jiowemk ekoweko eoweokw\" and \"Kiril Avganov Rachitov Avganov Rachitov Kiril\" is just a combination of random names)&nbsp; and no proper street names. It also says that the postal code 101000 used in one of the addresses belongs to the Central Post Office of Russia in Moscow or the so-called \"Pochtamt\" and that all of the addresses are represented as being from Moscow, Russia.&nbsp;<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Considering the degree of similarity between the registrars of the disputed domain names, their dates of registration, the manner in which each of the disputed domain names is used and what appears to be false address details based in Russia, the Panel finds that it is more likely than not that each of the disputed domain names were registered by the same person and is subject to common control. In these circumstances, it is equitable and procedurally efficient to permit the consolidation of the cases into these proceedings.<\/p>\n<p>The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Mr Alistair Payne"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2026-05-14 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "<p>The Complainant owns numerous trade mark registrations for its PAYSEND trade mark including International Registration Number1251936 for the PAYSEND word mark which was registered on April 10, 2015 and has subsequently been protected in numerous countries. It also owns International Registration 1735950 for PAYSEND LIBRE registered on February 23, 2023 and which is protected, in particular, in Russia.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>",
    "decision_domains": {
        "action-paysend.com ": "TRANSFERRED",
        "paysend-id644-receive.com": "TRANSFERRED",
        "paysend-id6255-au.com": "TRANSFERRED",
        "pay-send-aus.com ": "TRANSFERRED",
        "pay-send-id.com": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}