{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-108571",
    "time_of_filling": "2026-04-14 04:33:20",
    "domain_names": [
        "dialwaves.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Olga Dvořáková (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "Robert Nichols (Dialwave, Inc.)"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": null,
    "respondent": [
        "AKASH BHARDWAJ (innovateinfinite)"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "<p>The Complainant is a United States corporation engaged since 2021 in the provision of communications services such as voiceover Internet Protocol (VoIP) services, wireless and broadband communications, transmission of data and sound, video, and information, provision of access to communications infrastructure, and audio, video, and multimedia broadcasting via the Internet and other communications networks.<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant is the owner of the domain name &lt;dialwave.com&gt;, which was registered on January 18, 2021, and is used by the Complainant to promote its services across a wide range of territories around the world.<\/p>\n<p>The disputed domain name &lt;dialwaves.com&gt; was registered on March 11, 2026, and resolves to a website displaying a logo \"DialWaves\" and advertising outbound calling and related communications services.<\/p>",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "<p>The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>",
    "no_response_filed": "<p>COMPLAINANT<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant&rsquo;s trademark DIALWAVE, as it reproduces the trademark in its entirety with the mere addition of a letter &ldquo;s&rdquo;, followed by the generic Top Level Domain (&ldquo;gTLD&rdquo;) &ldquo;.com&rdquo;.<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant asserts that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name since the Respondent is not affiliated with the Complainant, has not been authorized to use the DIALWAVE mark and is not commonly known by the disputed domain name. The Complainant also states that the Respondent has used the disputed domain name to advertise outbound calling and related communications services that directly overlap with the Complainant's communications services and submits that such use creates a likelihood that Internet users will mistakenly believe that the disputed domain name is associated with, endorsed by, or affiliated with the Complainant, and is intended to divert consumers seeking the Complainant&rsquo;s services and to capitalize on the goodwill associated with the DIALWAVE mark.<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant submits that the Respondent registered and used the disputed domain name in bad faith since, by using a confusingly similar domain name in connection with services in the same commercial field, the Respondent demonstrates knowledge of the Complainant&rsquo;s rights and an intent to attract internet users for commercial gain, by creating a likelihood of confusion with the Complainant&rsquo;s mark.<\/p>\n<p>RESPONDENT<\/p>\n<p>No administratively compliant Response has been filed.<\/p>",
    "rights": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "bad_faith": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "procedural_factors": "<p>The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Luca Barbero"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2026-05-25 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "<p>The Complainant has demonstrated ownership of rights in the trademark DIALWAVE for the purposes of standing to file a UDRP complaint.<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant is the owner of the following trademark registrations:<\/p>\n<p>- European Union trademark registration No. 019104450 for DIALWAVE (word mark), filed on November 12, 2024, and registered on February 28, 2025, in class 38;<\/p>\n<p>- United Kingdom trademark registration No. UK00004024949 for DIALWAVE (word mark), filed on March 12, 2024, and registered on May 31, 2024, in class 38;<\/p>\n<p>- United States trademark registration No. 7693441 for DIALWAVE (word mark), filed on March 08, 2024, and registered on February 18, 2025, in international class 38.<\/p>",
    "decision_domains": {
        "dialwaves.com": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}