{ "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-108634", "time_of_filling": "2026-05-06 07:28:09", "domain_names": [ "schneiderelectr.com" ], "case_administrator": " Iveta Špiclová (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)", "complainant": [ "SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC SE" ], "complainant_representative": "NAMESHIELD S.A.S.", "respondent": [ "he jxing" ], "respondent_representative": null, "factual_background": "

A<\/strong>. Complainant<\/strong>'s Assertions<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Complainant is a French industrial group founded in 1871 and active internationally in the fields of power management, automation and related industrial solutions.<\/p>\n

The Complainant operates globally and reported revenues of approximately EUR 40 billion in 2025.<\/p>\n

B<\/strong>. Respondent<\/strong>'s Position<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Respondent did not file a Response. <\/p>\n

C<\/strong>. Disputed Domain Name<\/strong><\/p>\n

The disputed domain name <schneiderelectr.com> was registered on 28 April 2026.<\/p>\n

At the time of the Panel's review, the disputed domain name resolved to a website prominently displaying the designation \"Schneider Electric\" (the “Respondent’s website”). The Respondent's website contained technical content relating to battery storage, solar inverters, EV charging infrastructure and other renewable energy technologies, as well as an engineering enquiry form.<\/p>", "other_legal_proceedings": "

The Panel is unaware of any other pending or decided legal proceedings in respect of the domain name <schneiderelectr.com> (the \"disputed domain name\").<\/p>", "no_response_filed": "

A<\/strong>. Complainant<\/strong><\/p>\n

A<\/strong>.1 The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark in which the Complainant has rights<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Complainant submits that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC trade mark.  <\/p>\n

The disputed domain name reproduces the SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC trade mark almost in its entirety, omitting only the letters \"i\" and \"c\" from the word \"electric\". The Complainant contends that this constitutes a typical case of typosquatting.<\/p>\n

The Complainant further submits that the inclusion of the Top-Level Domain (the \"TLD\") <.com> does not affect the comparison.<\/p>\n

A<\/strong>.2 <\/strong>The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Complainant submits that the Respondent is not affiliated with the Complainant, has not been authorised to use the Complainant's trade mark, and is not commonly known by the disputed domain name.<\/p>\n

The Complainant further contends that the disputed domain name resolves to a website offering competing products while displaying the designation \"Schneider Electric\". <\/p>\n

The Complainant therefore submits that the Respondent is not making a bona fide<\/em> offering of goods or services, nor any legitimate non-commercial or fair use.<\/p>\n

A<\/strong>.3 <\/strong>The disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Complainant submits that the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith.<\/p>\n

The Complainant relies on the long-standing use and reputation of the SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC trade mark and contends that the Respondent must have been aware of its rights at the time of registration.<\/p>\n

The Complainant further submits that the disputed domain name is an intentional misspelling of its trade mark and that the Respondent uses the disputed domain name in connection with a website displaying the designation \"Schneider Electric\" and promoting competing products and services.<\/p>\n

According to the Complainant, such conduct demonstrates an intention to attract Internet users by creating a likelihood of confusion as to source, affiliation or endorsement.  <\/p>\n

A<\/strong>.4 Relief Sought <\/strong><\/p>\n

The Complainant requests that the disputed domain name <schneiderelectr.com> be transferred to it in accordance with paragraph 4(i) of the UDRP Policy.<\/p>\n

B<\/strong>. Respondent<\/strong><\/p>\n

No Response was filed. The Panel proceeds on the basis of the uncontested evidence and may draw appropriate inferences pursuant to Rule 14(b) of the UDRP Rules.<\/p>", "rights": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the UDRP Policy).<\/p>", "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the UDRP Policy).<\/p>", "bad_faith": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown that the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the UDRP Policy).<\/p>", "procedural_factors": "

The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under the UDRP Policy, the UDRP Rules, and the CAC Supplemental Rules have been met. The dispute is properly before the Panel.<\/p>", "decision": "Accepted", "panelists": [ "Gustavo Moser" ], "date_of_panel_decision": "2026-06-01 00:00:00", "informal_english_translation": "

The Complainant, Schneider Electric SE, owns several registered trade marks incorporating the designation SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC, including:<\/p>\n

• <\/span>International trade mark registration no. 715395, registered on 15 March 1999; and<\/p>\n

• <\/span>EU trade mark registration no. 1103803, registered on 12 March 1999.<\/p>\n

The Complainant is also the registrant of the domain name <schneiderelectric.com>, registered in 1996.<\/p>", "decision_domains": { "schneiderelectr.com": "TRANSFERRED" }, "panelist": null, "panellists_text": null }