{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-108683",
    "time_of_filling": "2026-05-26 11:26:37",
    "domain_names": [
        "blglogisitics.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Olga Dvořáková (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "BLG LOGISTICS GROUP AG & Co. KG "
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "NAMESHIELD S.A.S.",
    "respondent": [
        "mk cars"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "<p>The Complainant is a Germany seaport and logistics service provider with an international network.<\/p>\n<p>Since the Complainant was founded in 1877, the Complainant is now represented with almost 100 locations and branches in Europe, America, Africa and Asia. The Complainant has also operated domain name &lt;blg-logistics.com&gt; since 2004.<\/p>\n<p>The disputed domain name was registered on May 6, 2026. At the time of this Decision, the disputed domain name resolves to the parking page, which includes the statement &ldquo;Launching Soon&rdquo;, as well as a &ldquo;Contact Us&rdquo; section featuring a form with fields for name, email, and message.<\/p>",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "<p>The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>",
    "no_response_filed": "<p><strong>The Complainant<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Complainant asserts that each of the elements enumerated in paragraph 4(a) of the Policy and the corresponding provisions in the Rules have been satisfied. In particular, the Complainant asserts that:<\/p>\n<p>(1) the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant&rsquo;s trademark, since it incorporates the BLG LOGISTICS mark and the addition of the letter &ldquo;I&rdquo; in the generic term &ldquo;Logistics&rdquo; does not prevent confusion. The gTLD &ldquo;.com&rdquo; does not prevent the likelihood of confusion between the disputed domain name and the Complainant and its trademark;<\/p>\n<p>(2) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name. The Respondent is not affiliated with the Complainant, has no license or authorization to use the BLG LOGISTICS mark, and is not commonly known by the disputed domain name. The Complainant also claims that typosquatting is occurring, and finds this is additional evidence that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests under Policy. The disputed domain name resolves to the landing page. The Complainant contends that&nbsp;the&nbsp;Respondent did not make any use of the disputed domain name since the registration, and it confirms that&nbsp;the&nbsp;Respondent has no demonstrable plan to use them.&nbsp;Such conduct negates any claim of legitimate interests;&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>(3) the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. Registering the disputed domain name so obviously connected to a well-known mark without authorization is itself evidence of bad faith. Since the disputed domain name incorporates&nbsp;the Complainant&rsquo;s BLG LOGISTICS mark with the addition of the letter &ldquo;I&rdquo;, there is reason to believe that the Respondent registered the disputed domain name&nbsp;with full knowledge of the Complainant's trademark.&nbsp;The disputed domain name is a landing page, which does not preclude a finding of bad faith.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant requests transfer of the disputed domain name.<\/p>\n<p><strong>The Respondent<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant&rsquo;s contentions.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>",
    "rights": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "bad_faith": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "procedural_factors": "<p>The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Ganna Prokhorova"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2026-06-20 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "<p>The Complainant is the owner of multiple trademark registrations incorporating BLG LOGISTICS, including, inter alia:<\/p>\n<p>- United States Trademark Registration No. 8073002 for the mark BLG LOGISTICS (fig.), registered on December 23, 2025 in classes 35, 36, 37, and 39;<\/p>\n<p>- International Trademark Registration No. 1860476 for the mark BLG LOGISTICS (fig.), registered on February 6, 2025 in classes 35, 36, 37, and 39;<\/p>\n<p>- European Union Trademark Registration No. 019064627 for the mark BLG LOGISTICS (fig.), registered on December 27, 2024 in classes 35, 36, 37, and 39.<\/p>",
    "decision_domains": {
        "blglogisitics.com": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}