{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-108687",
    "time_of_filling": "2026-06-03 09:57:15",
    "domain_names": [
        "Clearstream-global.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "Clearstream Services, société anonyme  "
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Mark Peters LL.M. (Grünecker Patent und Rechtsanwälte PartG mbB)",
    "respondent": [
        "Orwell Sullivan"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "<p>The Complainant, Clearstream Services S.A., is a leading European provider of post-trading services and a wholly owned subsidiary of Deutsche B&ouml;rse AG. It provides settlement, custody and asset servicing services to customers in more than 110 countries and settles over 250,000 securities transactions on a daily basis. The Complainant conducts its business through; the website located at www.clearstream.com.<\/p>\n<p data-start=\"1289\" data-end=\"1375\">The disputed domain name<strong> <\/strong>&lt;clearstream-global.com&gt; was registered on 10 April 2026.<\/p>\n<p>Although the disputed domain name does not resolve to an active website, the evidence submitted by the Complainant demonstrates that it has been used in connection with the e-mail address compliance@clearstream-global.com to impersonate the Complainant and solicit sensitive identification documents from Internet users under the false pretext of regulatory compliance and anti-money laundering verification.<\/p>\n<p data-start=\"1828\" data-end=\"1974\">No information is known about the Respondent beyond the registration details available in the Whois records.<\/p>",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "<p>The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>",
    "no_response_filed": "<h2 data-section-id=\"nxd0ir\" data-start=\"2035\" data-end=\"2063\" class=\"PDq2pG_selectionAnchorContainer\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">COMPLAINANT'S CONTENTIONS<\/span><\/h2>\n<h2 data-section-id=\"nxd0ir\" data-start=\"2035\" data-end=\"2063\" class=\"PDq2pG_selectionAnchorContainer\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"><span aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"PDq2pG_selectionAnchor\"><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">Identical or confusingly similar<\/span><\/h2>\n<p data-start=\"2103\" data-end=\"2526\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its registered CLEARSTREAM trademarks because it incorporates the trademark in its entirety. The additional descriptive term \"global\" considers merely refers to worldwide activities and does not dispel the confusing similarity. The \".com\" generic Top-Level Domain is irrelevant for the assessment under the Policy.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3 data-section-id=\"1x04xi3\" data-start=\"2528\" data-end=\"2565\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">No rights or legitimate interests<\/span><\/h3>\n<p data-start=\"2567\" data-end=\"2777\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">The Complainant submits that the Respondent has never been authorised or licensed to use the CLEARSTREAM trademark, is not affiliated with the Complainant, and is not commonly known by the disputed domain name.<\/span><\/p>\n<p data-start=\"2779\" data-end=\"3171\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">The Complainant further argues that the disputed domain name has been used to send fraudulent emails impersonating the Complainant's compliance department and requesting recipients to provide passports, identity cards or driver's licences. According to the Complainant, such use cannot constitute a bona fide offering of goods or services or any legitimate non-commercial or fair use.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3 data-section-id=\"536meo\" data-start=\"3173\" data-end=\"3209\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">Registered and used in bad faith<\/span><\/h3>\n<p data-start=\"3211\" data-end=\"3365\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">The Complainant submits that the Respondent registered the disputed domain name with full knowledge of the Complainant's well-known CLEARSTREAM trademark.<\/span><\/p>\n<p data-start=\"3367\" data-end=\"3918\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">According to the Complainant, the disputed domain name has been used exclusively as part of a phishing scheme in which the Respondent impersonated the Complainant and falsely requested sensitive identification documents from recipients under the guise of compliance with anti-money laundering regulations. The Complainant therefore contends that the Respondent intentionally attempted to create a likelihood of confusion for fraudulent purposes, which constitutes clear evidence of bad faith registration and use.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2 data-section-id=\"lkhvv1\" data-start=\"3920\" data-end=\"3947\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">RESPONDENT'S CONTENTIONS<\/span><\/h2>\n<p>No administratively compliant Response has been filed.<\/p>",
    "rights": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to a trademark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "bad_faith": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "procedural_factors": "<p>The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Hana Císlerová"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2026-07-10 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "<p><span>The Complainant has established rights in the trademark <\/span><strong data-start=\"253\" data-end=\"268\">CLEARSTREAM<\/strong><span> through numerous trademark registrations worldwide, including European Union Trademark No. 001403476, with the priority date from 29 November 1999, the UK Trademark No. <\/span><span>UK00901403476, with the priority date from 29 November 1999,<\/span><span> and the United States Trademark Registration No. 2477515, also with the priority date from 29 November 1999, all registered for goods and services in Classes 9, 36 and 42. The Complainant also owns several additional national registrations for the trademark CLEARSTREAM in various jurisdictions, including Canada, Brazil, Switzerland, Australia, and China.<\/span><\/p>",
    "decision_domains": {
        "Clearstream-global.com": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}