{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-108694",
    "time_of_filling": "2026-06-12 10:26:30",
    "domain_names": [
        "eonenergyfit.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "E.ON SE"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Dr. Julian Erfurth (Lubberger Lehment Rechtsanwälte Partnerschaft mbB)",
    "respondent": [
        "Alex Lee (IPC tech inc)"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "<p><span>The Complainant is a major European energy company. It operates energy networks and infrastructure and provides energy-related customer solutions under the E.ON mark. The E.ON Group is one of Europe&rsquo;s largest operators of energy networks and energy infrastructure and supplies services to approximately 48 million customers. The Complainant, E.ON SE, is a member of Euro Stoxx 50 stock market index, DAX stock index and of the Dow Jones Global Titans 50 index.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>The disputed domain name &lt;eonenergyfit.com&gt; was registered on 26 January 2026. It incorporates the word element of the Complainant&rsquo;s E.ON mark, omitting the dot, and adds the words &ldquo;energyfit&rdquo;.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>According to the Complaint and the evidence, the disputed domain name resolved to a website that mimicked an official E.ON website as of 3 June 2026. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>The Respondent is IPC tech inc \/ Alex Lee of Malaysia. Nothing in the record suggests any relationship between the Respondent and the Complainant.<\/span><\/p>",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "<p>The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>",
    "no_response_filed": "<p>The Complainant contends that the requirements of the Policy have been met and that the disputed domain name should be transferred to it. <br \/>No administratively compliant Response has been filed.<\/p>",
    "rights": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "bad_faith": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "procedural_factors": "<p>The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Victoria McEvedy"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2026-07-22 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "<p><span>The Complainant relies on registered trade mark rights in the word mark E.ON including:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>1. EUTM No. 002361558, E.ON, registered on 19 December 2002 in classes 35, 39 and 40;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>2. EUTM No. 002362416, e.on, registered on 19 December 2002 in classes 35, 39 and 40;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>3. EUTM No. 006296529, e.on, registered on 27 June 2008 in classes 7, 36, 37 and 40; and<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>4. EUTM No. 00876364, a figurative mark including the word element e.on, registered on 9 September 2005 in classes 4, 35, 39 and 40.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>The Complainant also relies on its longstanding and extensive use of E.ON as a company name and trade mark and says that E.ON is a highly distinctive mark with a substantial reputation in the European Union and beyond.<\/span><\/p>",
    "decision_domains": {
        "eonenergyfit.com": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}