The Complainant is Adobe Inc., a United States technology company established in 1982. It develops and markets a wide range of software and digital media products, including well-known applications such as Adobe Photoshop, Adobe Illustrator, Adobe Creative Cloud and Adobe Document Cloud. The Complainant states that it has more than 30,000 employees worldwide, had US $19.41 billion in revenues for the 2023 fiscal year, and owns an extensive portfolio of trademark registrations for the mark ADOBE in numerous jurisdictions, many of which long predate the registration of the disputed domain names.<\/p>\n
The Complainant alleges that both disputed domain names initially resolved to the same commercial website based in Bangladesh. According to the Complainant, the website prominently displays the Complainant's ADOBE trademark and logo, offers software represented as Adobe products, and also advertises unrelated technology products and services. The Complainant further submits that, following receipt of a cease-and-desist notice, the disputed domain name <adobeccpro.com> was redirected to a page offering the domain name for sale.<\/p>\n
The Complainant also requests consolidation of the proceeding. It submits that, although the disputed domain names are registered in the names of two different registrants, they are under common control because, amongst other things, both domain names resolved to the same website, displayed the same content and branding, and formed part of the same commercial operation.<\/span><\/p>\n Registration of the disputed domain names<\/strong><\/p>\n The disputed domain names are <adobebazar.com>, registered on April 17, 2025, and <adobeccpro.com>, registered on October 12, 2025.<\/span><\/p>\n First UDRP Element – the disputed domain names are Confusingly Similar to the Complainant’s Trademark<\/strong><\/p>\n The Complainant asserts that it owns numerous trademark registrations for the mark ADOBE around the world, all of which predate the registration of the disputed domain names.<\/p>\n The Complainant submits that the disputed domain names <adobebazar.com> and <adobeccpro.com> each incorporate the ADOBE trademark in its entirety. It contends that the addition of the descriptive terms \"bazar\" and \"ccpro\" does not prevent a finding of confusing similarity. The Complainant further submits that the \".com\" gTLD should be disregarded for the purposes of the comparison.<\/p>\n Second UDRP Element – The Respondent has no Rights or Legitimate Interests in the disputed domain names<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n The Complainant asserts that it has not licensed, authorized or otherwise permitted the Respondent to use the ADOBE trademark or to register domain names incorporating that mark.<\/p>\n The Complainant further submits that the Respondent is not commonly known by either of the disputed domain names. According to the Complaint, the disputed domain names resolved to a commercial website prominently displaying the Complainant's ADOBE trademark and logo while offering software represented as Adobe products together with unrelated technology products and services. The Complainant contends that such use is intended to mislead Internet users into believing that the website is affiliated with or authorized by the Complainant and therefore does not constitute a bona fide offering of goods or services or a legitimate non-commercial or fair use of the disputed domain names.<\/span><\/p>\n Third UDRP Element – The disputed domain names were Registered and are Being Used in Bad Faith<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n The Complainant asserts that the ADOBE trademark is well known internationally and had acquired substantial goodwill long before the registration of the disputed domain names.<\/p>\n The Complainant contends that the Respondent deliberately registered domain names incorporating the ADOBE trademark in order to create a false association with the Complainant. It submits that the disputed domain names were used to resolve to the same commercial website, which prominently displayed the Complainant's trademark and logo and purported to offer Adobe software, thereby intentionally attracting Internet users for commercial gain by creating a likelihood of confusion with the Complainant's mark.<\/p>\n The Complainant further submits that, after receiving a cease-and-desist letter, one of the disputed domain names was redirected to a webpage offering the domain name for sale, which it says provides further evidence of bad faith. The Complainant also relies on the Respondent's failure to reply to its cease-and-desist correspondence as additional support for a finding of bad faith.<\/p>\n The foregoing facts and arguments asserted by the Complainant are uncontested because no Response was filed.<\/p>",
"other_legal_proceedings": " The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain names.<\/p>",
"no_response_filed": " Complainant´s contentions are summarized above.<\/p>\n The Complainant contends that the requirements of the Policy have been met and that the disputed domain names should be transferred to it.<\/p>\n No administratively compliant Response has been filed.<\/p>",
"rights": " The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>",
"no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": " The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain names (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
"bad_faith": " The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names have been registered and are being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
"procedural_factors": " The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
"decision": "Accepted",
"panelists": [
"Claire Kowarsky"
],
"date_of_panel_decision": "2026-08-06 00:00:00",
"informal_english_translation": " The Complainant relies on several of its registered trademarks, in territories around the world, including:<\/p>\n Further, the Complainant operates its business using its domain name <adobe.com>.<\/p>",
"decision_domains": {
"adobebazar.com": "TRANSFERRED",
"adobeccpro.com": "TRANSFERRED"
},
"panelist": null,
"panellists_text": null
}\n