{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-108878",
    "time_of_filling": "2026-07-31 09:52:31",
    "domain_names": [
        "it-airways.cfd"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Olga Dvořáková (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "ITALIA TRASPORTO AEREO S.p.A."
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Andrea Mascetti (Barzanò & Zanardo Milano S.p.A.)",
    "respondent": [
        "ZHUOXUE LI"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "<p>The Complainant, Italia Trasporto Aereo S.p.A.(&ldquo;ITA&rdquo;), is the Italian flagship airline which in 2021 acquired the former Alitalia - Societ&agrave; Aerea Italiana S.p.A. in Amministrazione Straordinaria&rsquo;s (Alitalia) business.<\/p>\n<p>The disputed domain name was registered on July 21, 2026 and <span>is not actively used<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "<p>The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>",
    "no_response_filed": "<p><b>Complaint<\/b><\/p>\n<p>The Complainant's contentions can be summarised as follows:<\/p>\n<p><span>The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant&rsquo;s earlier trademarks as it contains the well-known ITA and ITA AIRWAYS trademarks, t<\/span><span>he addition of the \"-\" has no impact on the confusing similarity assessment of the first element of the Policy, and the <\/span><span>addition of the gTLD .cfd has no impact in the confusing similarity assessment since it has a technical function.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>The Respondent is not an authorized dealer, agent, distributor or reseller of ITA and is not authorized to register and use the ITA and ITA AIRWAYS trademarks in a domain name.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span><strong><u><\/u><\/strong><\/span>The disputed domain name is not actively used. Thus the disputed domain name is not used for a legitimate non-commercial or fair activity, nor in connection with a bona fide offering of goods and services.<\/p>\n<p><span>The Respondent has not rebutted the Complainant's prima facie case that the Respondent lacks rights and legitimate interests in respect of the Disputed Domain Name.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The Respondent could not have been ignorant of the existence of the Complainant's trademarks at the time of the registration of the disputed domain names as they are very well-known. The disputed domain name combines ITA with AIRWAYS, a clear reference to the Complainant&rsquo;s field of activity.<\/p>\n<p><span>The disputed domain name currently links to an inactive website. Previous panelists have found that the non-use of a domain name (including a blank or &ldquo;coming soon&rdquo; page) does not prevent a finding of bad faith under the doctrine of passive holding. Elements such as \"(<em>i) the degree of distinctiveness or reputation of the complainant&rsquo;s mark, (ii) the failure of the respondent to submit a response or to provide any evidence of actual or contemplated good-faith use, (iii) the respondent&rsquo;s concealing its identity or use of false contact details (noted to be in breach of its registration agreement), and (iv) the implausibility of any good faith use to which the domain name may be put<\/em>\" have been considered material in order to determine use in bad faith.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>In this case, the Complainant's trademarks are well known and the Respondent has not responded to this Complaint and has shielded its identity. The Respondent has<\/span><span>&nbsp;registered and used the Disputed Domain Name in bad faith.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Response <\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>No administratively compliant Response has been filed.<\/b><\/p>",
    "rights": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "bad_faith": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "procedural_factors": "<p>The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Dawn Osborne"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2026-08-22 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "<p><span>The Complainant is the owner of the ITA and ITA AIRWAYS trade marks including the following registrations:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>-ITA (word), EU Reg. no. 018667224, registered on June 10, 2024 in classes 3, 9, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26, 28, 30, 33, 34, 35, 37, 39, 42, 43;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>-ITA (device), EU reg. no. 018685967, registered on September 24, 2022 in classes 3, 9, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26, 28, 30, 33, 34, 35, 37, 39, 42, 43;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>- ITA AIRWAYS, EU reg. no. 018775945, registered on April 19, 2023 in class 39.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The Complainant registered the domain name &lt;www.ita-airways.com&gt; on October 4, 2021 which it uses for its web site.<\/p>",
    "decision_domains": {
        "it-airways.cfd": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}