{ "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-108834", "time_of_filling": "2026-07-16 10:10:24", "domain_names": [ "nsfwkling.ai" ], "case_administrator": "Olga Dvořáková (Case admin)", "complainant": [ "Beijing Dajia Internet Information Technology Co. Ltd.", "Beijing Kuaishou Technology Co. Ltd. " ], "complainant_representative": null, "respondent": [ "Vincent Jackson" ], "respondent_representative": null, "factual_background": "

The Complainants are two related companies, with Complainant 1 (<\/span>Beijing Dajia Internet Information Technology Co. Ltd) being an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Complainant 2 (<\/span>Beijing Kuaishou Technology Co. Ltd). The Complainants operate in the field of artificial intelligence and audio-visual technologies.<\/span><\/p>\n

The Complainants have developed an artificial intelligence product called “KlingAI”, which enables users to generate photos and videos based on textual, visual or audiovisual input. The product has gained significant global recognition and is accessible via the website <klingai.com> as well as through mobile applications.<\/span><\/p>\n

Complainant 1 is the owner of registered trademarks “KLING” and “KLING AI” in several jurisdictions, including the United Kingdom, the European Union, the United States and Australia.<\/span><\/p>\n

The disputed domain name <<\/span>nsfwkling.ai> was registered between September 28, 2025 and resolves to identical or highly similar websites offering paid AI services under the name “Kling AI”.<\/span><\/p>\n

No information is known about the Respondent who registered the disputed domain names using <\/span>the privacy protection service<\/span>. <\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n

The Respondent filed a reply to the Complaint challenging the arguments filed in the Complaint.<\/span><\/p>", "other_legal_proceedings": "

The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>", "no_response_filed": "

COMPLAINANTS<\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n

The Complainants contend that:<\/p>\n

The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainants' trademarks.<\/p>\n

The Complainant asserts that the addition of the generic or common acronym “nsfw” is not sufficient to escape the finding that the domain name is confusingly similar to the trademarks KLING and KLING AI. <\/p>\n

The Complainant concludes that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to their KLING and KLING AI trademarks.<\/p>\n

The Respondent does not have any rights or legitimate interest in the disputed domain name<\/p>\n

The Complainant contends that the Respondent is not commonly known by the disputed domain name and that the Respondent is not affiliated with or authorized by the Complainant in any way.<\/p>\n

The Complainant contends that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name, and is not related to the Complainant’s business in any way. The Complainant does not carry out any activity for, nor does it have any business dealings with, the Respondent.The Complainant further contends that the disputed domain name was redirecting to a fraudulent website reproducing the Complainant's website, and that this is a typical case of impersonation and undeniable evidence that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name.<\/p>\n

The disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith<\/p>\n

The Complainant contends that the Respondent could not be unaware of the existence of the KLING and KLING AI trademarks at the time of registration of the disputed domain name, not only because KLING and KLING AI are well-known trademarks, but also in consideration of the nature and content of the domain name. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

The Complainant contends that the requirements of the Policy have been met and that the disputed domain name should be transferred to it.<\/span><\/p>\n

RESPONDENT<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Respondent challenged the Complainant's arguments and indicated that:<\/p>\n

 The string should be appreciated as a whole, and thus the risk of confusion should be demonstrated by the Complainants.<\/p>\n

 On the absence of interest, the Respondent indicated that the domain name was offering services and was duly exploited with an active AI-online project.<\/p>\n

 On the bad faith matter, the Respondent denied any such bad faith as the domain name was not offered for sale to the Complainants; the domain name and website attached do not mislead internet users.<\/p>", "rights": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>", "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "bad_faith": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "procedural_factors": "

The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>", "decision": "Accepted", "panelists": [ "David-Irving Tayer" ], "date_of_panel_decision": "2026-08-24 00:00:00", "informal_english_translation": "

The Complainants are the owners of various trademarks KLING or KLING AI and in particular:<\/p>\n