Complainant states that it “has used the SCANquilt designation in connection with the sale of home textiles and related goods since 1992”; and that it “operates its official online store at <scanquilt.cz>.”<\/p>\n
The Disputed Domain Name was created on August 1, 2026, and, according to the Complaint (and as confirmed by screenshots submitted therewith), “the Respondent has used the disputed domain name to impersonate the Complainant and to operate an unauthorised and fraudulent copy of the Complainant’s official online store” by “reproduce[ing] or imitate[ing] the Complainant’s website, including product photographs, textes [sixc], logo, graphic design, product offer and other elements.”<\/p>", "other_legal_proceedings": "
The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings that are pending or decided and that relate to the Disputed Domain Name.<\/p>", "no_response_filed": "
Complainant contends, in relevant part, as follows:<\/p>\n
Paragraph 4(a)(i): Complainant states that the Disputed Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to the SCANQUILT Trademark because, inter alia<\/em>, it “incorporates the Complainant’s SCANquilt trademark in its entirety and without any alteration.”<\/p>\n Paragraph 4(a)(ii): Complainant states that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Disputed Domain Name because, inter alia<\/em>, “Respondent is not affiliated with the Complainant and has never been authorised, licensed or otherwise permitted by the Complainant to use the SCANquilt trademark, register a domain name incorporating that trademark, or operate an online store under the SCANquilt name”; “the Respondent is not commonly known by the name ‘SCANquilt’ and holds no trademark or other legitimate rights in that designation”; and “[t]he disputed domain name has not been used in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services or for any legitimate non-commercial or fair purpose” because “the Respondent has used the disputed domain name to impersonate the Complainant and to operate an unauthorised and fraudulent copy of the Complainant’s official online store.”<\/p>\n Paragraph 4(a)(iii): Complainant states that the Disputed Domain Name was registered and is being used in bad faith because, inter alia<\/em>, “[c]onsidering that the disputed domain name consists exclusively of the distinctive SCANquilt trademark and that the associated website copies or closely imitates the Complainant’s official online store, the Respondent was clearly aware of the Complainant and its rights when registering the disputed domain name”; “Respondent intentionally selected the disputed domain name in order to create the false impression that the website was operated, authorised or endorsed by the Complainant”; and “[b]y using the disputed domain name in this manner, the Respondent has intentionally attempted to attract Internet users for commercial gain by creating a likelihood of confusion with the Complainant’s SCANquilt trademark as to the source, sponsorship, affiliation or endorsement of the Respondent’s website and the goods or services offered through it.”<\/p>\n No administratively compliant response has been filed.<\/p>",
"rights": " The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Disputed Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the UDRP).<\/p>",
"no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": " The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Disputed Domain Name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the UDRP).<\/p>",
"bad_faith": " The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Disputed Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the UDRP).<\/p>",
"procedural_factors": " The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
"decision": "Accepted",
"panelists": [
"Douglas Isenberg"
],
"date_of_panel_decision": "2026-08-31 00:00:00",
"informal_english_translation": " Complainant states, and provides documentation in support thereof, that it is the owner of EU Reg. No. 010074011 for SCANQUILT (registered December 2, 2011) for use in connection with, inter alia<\/em>, mattresses; bed linen; and clothing and footwear (the “SCANQUILT Trademark”).<\/p>",
"decision_domains": {
"scanquilt.shop": "TRANSFERRED"
},
"panelist": null,
"panellists_text": null
}