{ "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-108938", "time_of_filling": "2026-08-21 10:21:52", "domain_names": [ "boursosbank.com" ], "case_administrator": " Iveta Špiclová (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)", "complainant": [ "BOURSORAMA" ], "complainant_representative": "NAMESHIELD S.A.S.", "respondent": [ "Gabr Vasquez" ], "respondent_representative": null, "factual_background": "

The Complainant, Boursorama, is a French banking and financial services company. The Complainant is the owner of trademark rights on the terms BOURSO and BOUSOBANK.<\/p>\n

The Complainant also owns a number of domain names, including <boursorama.com> and <boursobank.com>.<\/p>\n

The disputed domain name was registered on 19 August 2026 and resolves to a parking page of pay-per-click commercial links. <\/p>", "other_legal_proceedings": "

The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>", "no_response_filed": "

COMPLAINANT:<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Complainant asserts that the disputed domain name <boursosbank.com> is confusingly similar to its trademark BOUSOBANK, and its domain names. The Complainant argues the obvious misspelling of the Complainant’s trademark (i.e. the addition of the letter “S”). <\/span>Moreover, the Complainant contends that the addition of the suffix “.com” does not change the overall impression of the designation as being connected to the trademarks BOURSO and BOUSOBANK.<\/p>\n

Per the Complaint, the Respondent is not known by the Complainant. The Complainant contends that Respondent is not affiliated with nor authorized by the Complainant in any way and that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name. The Complainant does not carry out any activity for, nor has any business with the Respondent. Furthermore, the disputed domain name resolves to a parking page of pay-per-click commercial links and the Respondent has not used or made preparations to use the disputed domain name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services.<\/p>\n

As regards the bad faith of the Respondent, the disputed domain name is similar to the well-known and distinctive trademark BOURSOBANK. It is reasonable to infer that the Respondent has registered the domain name with full knowledge of the Complainant's trademark.<\/p>\n

The Complainant states that the disputed domain name is used in connection with a parking page. The Complainant contends that the Respondent has not demonstrated any activity in respect of the disputed domain name, and it is not possible to conceive of any plausible actual or contemplated active use of the domain name by the Respondent that would not be illegitimate.<\/p>\n

RESPONDENT:<\/strong><\/p>\n

NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED. <\/p>", "rights": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>", "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "bad_faith": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "procedural_factors": "

The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>", "decision": "Accepted", "panelists": [ "Arthur Fouré" ], "date_of_panel_decision": "2026-10-02 00:00:00", "informal_english_translation": "

The Complainant has provided evidence of ownership of the following trademark:<\/p>\n