{ "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-108902", "time_of_filling": "2026-09-09 13:35:30", "domain_names": [ "studio-anneloes.com" ], "case_administrator": "Olga Slanařová (Case admin)", "complainant": [ "Coöperatie SNB-REACT U.A." ], "complainant_representative": null, "respondent": [ "WEQ ASD (WEQ ASD)" ], "respondent_representative": null, "factual_background": "

The Complainant, Studio Anneloes Holding B.V., is the parent company of Studio Anneloes B.V. <\/span>and the owner of the Studio Anneloes brand, a Dutch women's fashion brand specializing in the design and sale of apparel. It was founded in 2006 by Anneloes van der Heijden.<\/span><\/p>\n

The Complainant enjoys a strong presence in the Benelux and German fashion markets. Its collections are sold through its web shops<\/span>, mobile app, and more th<\/span>an 300 physical stores. In 2025, Studio Anneloes became a Certified B Corporation, reflecting its commitment to responsible business practices, transparency, fair production, and environmental stewardship. Economically, the brand has experienced significant growth since its founding, with an annual online turnover of approximately €11 million.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

The Complainant has been the owner of the STUDIO ANNELOES Trademarks since 22 June 2017<\/span>. The disputed domain name was registered on 5 July 2026. <\/span>The Complainant has exclusive trademark rights which predate the registration of the disputed domain name. In addition, the Complainant has been operating through the domain <studioanneloes.nl>, which was registered on May 1 2006<\/span>. The corresponding website is used by the Complainant as a Dutch web shop where customers can purchase the Complainant’s products in the Complainant’s official web shop<\/span>.  <\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n

The disputed domain name incorporates the STUDIO ANNELOES Trademarks in its entirety, in combination with a hyphen. <\/span> <\/span><\/p>", "other_legal_proceedings": "

The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>", "no_response_filed": "

The Complainant contends that the requirements of the Policy have been met and that the disputed domain name should be transferred to it.
No administratively compliant Response has been filed.<\/p>", "rights": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>", "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "bad_faith": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "procedural_factors": "

The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>", "decision": "Accepted", "panelists": [ "Udo Pfleghar B.A. (Melb.)" ], "date_of_panel_decision": "2026-10-20 00:00:00", "informal_english_translation": "

The Complainant is the holder of inter alia <\/em>the following trademark registrations: <\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n