{ "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-109028", "time_of_filling": "2026-09-23 10:17:20", "domain_names": [ "russellstoverstore.com" ], "case_administrator": " Iveta Špiclová (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)", "complainant": [ "Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG" ], "complainant_representative": "SILKA AB", "respondent": [ "George Rodriguez" ], "respondent_representative": null, "factual_background": "

The Complainant, Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG, is a Swiss chocolate manufacturer founded in 1845. The Complainant has provided evidence of ownership of trademark registrations for the mark “RUSSELL STOVER\".<\/p>\n

The disputed domain name was registered on August 19, 2026, and used to resolve to a webpage impersonating the Complainant. Further to a takedown request, the Domain Name resolves to an error page.<\/p>", "other_legal_proceedings": "

The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>", "no_response_filed": "

COMPLAINANT<\/strong><\/p>\n

The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark RUSSELL STOVER. The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name exactly reproduces the well-known trademark “RUSSELL STOVER”, with the mere addition of the English term “store”.<\/p>\n

Per the Complaint, the Respondent is not known by the disputed domain name. The Respondent does not use the disputed domain name for legitimate or non-commercial fair use or in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services, per the Complainant. Indeed, the Complainant submits that the disputed domain RUSSELL STOVER used to resolve to a website impersonating the Complainant, reproducing the RUSSELL STOVER mark and offering RUSSELL STOVER-branded items for sale without authorization. The website was removed following a takedown request from the Complainant’s Representative.<\/p>\n

As regards the bad faith of the Respondent, the disputed domain name includes the distinctive trademark RUSSELL STOVER. The Respondent has registered the disputed domain name with full knowledge of the Complainant's trademark, as evidenced by the structure of the domain name and the use of the disputed domain name by the Respondent. The current inactive use of a domain name does not prevent a finding of bad faith registration and use, per the Complainant.<\/p>\n

 RESPONDENT<\/strong><\/p>\n

NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED<\/p>", "rights": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>", "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "bad_faith": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "procedural_factors": "

The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>", "decision": "Accepted", "panelists": [ "Arthur Fouré" ], "date_of_panel_decision": "2026-11-04 00:00:00", "informal_english_translation": "

The Complainant has provided evidence of ownership of several trademarks in the term RUSSELL STOVER, including the following:<\/p>\n