{ "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-109048", "time_of_filling": "2026-10-06 11:23:54", "domain_names": [ "fr-totalenergiesinvest.com ", "totalenergiesinvest.com" ], "case_administrator": "Olga Slanařová (Case admin)", "complainant": [ "TotalEnergies SE" ], "complainant_representative": "FRANCK CASO (IN CONCRETO)", "respondent": [ "JUS TICE", "lvda" ], "respondent_representative": null, "factual_background": "

The Complainant is a worldwide and well-known company that produces and markets energies on a global scale: oil and biofuels, natural gas and green gases, renewables, and electricity, operating worldwide in more than 120 countries, through a large group, and numerous subsidiaries. The “TotalEnergies” brand (and associated logo) is the 106th<\/sup> most valuable brand globally in 2025.<\/p>\n

The disputed domain names <fr-totalenergiesinvest.com> and <totalenergiesinvest.com> were registered respectively on June 30 and August 19, 2026.<\/p>", "other_legal_proceedings": "

The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain names.<\/p>", "no_response_filed": "


The Complainant contends that the requirements of the Policy have been met and that the disputed domain names should be transferred to it.<\/p>\n

No administratively compliant Response has been filed.<\/p>", "rights": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>", "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain names (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "bad_faith": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names have been registered and are being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "procedural_factors": "

The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>\n

The Complainant seeks consolidation, asserting:<\/p>\n

 “The disputed domain names fr-totalenergiesinvest.com <\/strong>and totalenergiesinvest.com<\/strong> appear to be subject to common control by a single individual or entity, or at least by a group of individuals acting in concert.”<\/p>\n

Paragraph 3(c) of the Rules provides that a “complaint may relate to more than one domain name, provided that the domain names are registered by the same domain name holder” and Paragraph 10 (e) provides that “A Panel shall decide a request by a Party to consolidate multiple domain name disputes in accordance with the Policy and these Rules.”<\/p>\n

The WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Select UDRP Questions (“WIPO Overview 3.1”), section 4.11.2 provides:<\/p>\n

“Complaint consolidated against multiple respondents<\/p>\n

“Where a complaint is filed against multiple respondents, panels look at whether (i) the domain names or corresponding websites are subject to common control, and (ii) the consolidation would be fair and equitable to all parties. Procedural efficiency would also underpin panel consideration of such a consolidation scenario.<\/p>\n

“Panels have considered a range of factors, typically present in some combination, as useful to determining whether such consolidation is appropriate, such as similarities in or relevant aspects of (i) the registrants’ identity(ies) including pseudonyms, (ii) the registrants’ contact information including email address(es), postal address(es), or phone number(s), including any pattern of irregularities, (iii) relevant IP addresses, name servers, or webhost(s), (iv) the content or layout of websites corresponding to the disputed domain names, (v) the nature of the marks at issue (e.g., where a registrant targets a specific sector), (vi) any naming patterns in the disputed domain names (e.g., <mark-country> or <mark-goods>), (vii) the relevant language\/scripts of the disputed domain names particularly where they are the same as the mark(s) at issue, (viii) any changes by the respondent relating to any of the above items following communications regarding the disputed domain name(s), (ix) any evidence of respondent affiliation with respect to the ability to control the disputed domain name(s), (x) any (prior) pattern of similar respondent behavior, or (xi) other arguments made by the complainant and\/or disclosures by the respondent(s).”<\/p>\n

The Complainant has satisfied the Panel that the <fr-totalenergiesinvest.com> and <totalenergiesinvest.com> domain names are subject to common control and that consolidation would be fair and equitable to all parties. Hence this decision refers to JUS TICE \/ Ivda as “the Respondent”.<\/p>", "decision": "Accepted", "panelists": [ "Alan Limbury" ], "date_of_panel_decision": "2026-11-12 00:00:00", "informal_english_translation": "

The Complainant is the owner of several trademarks TOTAL ENERGIES, registered worldwide, including:<\/p>\n

European Union trademark TOTAL ENERGIES n°018308753 registered on May 31, 2021;<\/p>\n

European Union trademark TotalEnergies (combined) n°018392850 registered on June 28, 2021; and<\/p>\n

International trademark TotalEnergies (combined) n°1601110 registered on February 9, 2021.<\/p>\n

International trademark TotalEnergies (combined logo) n°1601092 registered on May 18, 2021.<\/p>", "decision_domains": { "fr-totalenergiesinvest.com ": "TRANSFERRED", "totalenergiesinvest.com": "TRANSFERRED" }, "panelist": null, "panellists_text": null }